DUNVILLE V. FEDEX FREIGHT, INC.
DAWNA DUNVILLE |
FEDEX FREIGHT,INC. |
3:2022cv00045 |
April 13, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Sarah Evans Barker |
Matthew P Brookman |
Richard L Young |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by FEDEX FREIGHT,INC..(Ratton, Robert) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Ratton, III on behalf of Defendant FEDEX FREIGHT,INC.. (Ratton, Robert) |
Filing 11 ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC INITIAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE - The above case is hereby assigned for a TELEPHONIC INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE on JULY 6, 2022 at 9:00 a.m., Evansville time (CDT), before the Honorable Matthew P. Brookman, United States Magistrate Judge. The information needed for counsel to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. No fewer than seven (7) days before the IPTC, counsel must file a proposed CMP. SEE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 5/3/2022.(AAS) |
Filing 10 NOTICE to File Corporate Disclosure Statement to FEDEX FREIGHT,INC.. (RAGS) (JRB) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Reassignment of Case to Judge Sarah Evans Barker. Judge Richard L. Young is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number, 3:22-cv-0045-SEB-MPB, on all future filings in this matter. (JRB) |
Filing 8 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Clerk is directed to randomly reassign case and notify parties of newly assigned Judge. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 5/2/2022. (TMD) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant FEDEX FREIGHT,INC.. (Blanton, Jean) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Jean Marie Blanton on behalf of Defendant FEDEX FREIGHT,INC.. (Blanton, Jean) |
Filing 5 RETURN of Service by CMRRR, filed by DAWNA DUNVILLE. FEDEX FREIGHT,INC. served on 4/19/2022. (Biesecker, Kyle) |
Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AAS) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to FEDEX FREIGHT,INC. (AAS) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Kyle Frederick Biesecker on behalf of Plaintiff DAWNA DUNVILLE. (Biesecker, Kyle) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against FEDEX FREIGHT,INC., filed by DAWNA DUNVILLE. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7057692) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Biesecker, Kyle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: DUNVILLE V. FEDEX FREIGHT, INC. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: DAWNA DUNVILLE | |
Represented By: | Kyle Frederick Biesecker |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: FEDEX FREIGHT,INC. | |
Represented By: | Jean Marie Blanton |
Represented By: | Robert Ratton, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.