JOHNSON v. MITCHELL
| FLOYD WAYNE JOHNSON |
| DAN MITCHELL |
| 3:2022cv00103 |
| July 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Richard L Young |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Motion to Dismiss filed by DAN MITCHELL.. (Inman, Peter) Modified on 9/6/2022 (JRB). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter Andrew Inman on behalf of Respondent DAN MITCHELL. (Inman, Peter) |
Filing 4
Order to Show Cause - Good Time Credit: Petitioner Floyd Wayne Johnson's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges the state of Indiana's calculation of the petitioner's good time credit. Petitioner shall have through 8/22/22, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate his/her financial inability to do so. Respondent is ORDERED to enter an appearance by 8/3/22. If respondent argues that all claims in the petition are subject to one of the procedural bars for dismissal outlined in Rule 5(b), respondent is ORDERED to file a motion to dismiss based on a complete procedural bar by 9/2/22. If Track 1 does not apply, respondent is ORDERED to answer the petition by 9/23/22. The Court does not anticipate extending respondent's deadlines absent respondent specifically setting forth extraordinary circumstances (SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DEADLINES). Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 7/22/2022.(JRB)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by FLOYD WAYNE JOHNSON. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(JRB) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by FLOYD WAYNE JOHNSON located at BRANCHVILLE CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by FLOYD WAYNE JOHNSON to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (JRB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JOHNSON v. MITCHELL | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: FLOYD WAYNE JOHNSON | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: DAN MITCHELL | |
| Represented By: | Peter Andrew Inman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
