RICHARDSON v. WORRALL et al
LARRY RICHARDSON |
MICHAEL WORRALL and MATTHEW BROOKMAN |
3:2022cv00136 |
September 2, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Matthew P Brookman |
Richard L Young |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MOTION to Reopen Complaint and Motion to Higher Court Authority, filed by Plaintiff LARRY RICHARDSON. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Amended Complaint)(JRB) |
Filing 5 FINAL JUDGMENT - Consistent with the Entry issued today, final judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 9/19/2022.(JRB) |
Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING IFP AND SCREENING COMPLAINT - Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis #2 is GRANTED. 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). For the reasons stated above, Plaintiff's lawsuit against ALJ Worrall and Magistrate Judge Brookman is DISMISSED with PREJUDICE. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 9/19/2022. (JRB) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff LARRY RICHARDSON. (JRB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MATTHEW BROOKMAN, MICHAEL WORRALL, filed by LARRY RICHARDSON. (No fee paid with this filing) (JRB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.