BENNETT v. KELLEY et al
| WALTER BRANSON BENNETT |
| MICHAEL J. KELLEY and PLUTO CORPORATION |
| 3:2022cv00210 |
| December 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Richard L Young |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 FINAL JUDGMENT - The court dismissed Plaintiff's suit without prejudice. Accordingly, final judgment is hereby entered against Plaintiff and in favor of Defendants. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 02/02/2023.(AAS) |
| Filing 7 ENTRY DISMISSING CASE - On January 5, 2023, the court dismissed Plaintiff's complaint following screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). The court gave Plaintiff until February 1, 2023, to file an amended complaint. The court explained that it would dismiss1 the case if Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 02/02/2023.(AAS) |
| Filing 6 Mail Returned as undeliverable. #5 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis sent to WALTER BRANSON BENNETT, 21 East Oregon Street, Evansville, IN 47711. (AAS) Modified on 1/23/2023 (JRB). |
| Filing 5 ENTRY ON MOTION FOR IFP AND SCREENING COMPLAINT - The court GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File In Forma Pauperis (Filing No. 2). However, the court DISMISSES the complaint (Filing No. 1) without prejudice. Plaintiff will have leave to amend his complaint and add additional factual details consistent with the court's observations above. In particular, he should focus on telling the court the story of his termination-- being sure to describe that event and any important preceding events--and what lead him to believe this termination was because of his age. He shall have until February 1, 2023, to file an amended complaint or the case will be dismissed with prejudice without further warning. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 1/5/23. (JRB) |
| Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (JRB) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff WALTER BRANSON BENNETT. (JRB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MICHAEL J. KELLEY, PLUTO CORPORATION, filed by WALTER BRANSON BENNETT. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(JRB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
