WALKER v. DICKE et al
| JUSTIN MATTHEW WALKER |
| GARY DICKE, JANOSA LAZ, STELLA BLAIRE and KELLENE REINKE |
| 3:2023cv00020 |
| February 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Richard L Young |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk as to 1) Correctional Officer Gary Dickie; (2) Assistant Jail Commander Janosa Laz; (3) Jail Commander Stella Blair; and (4) Deputy Sheriff Kellene Reinke (JRB) |
Filing 10
Order Screening Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - This summary of claims includes all of the viable claims identified by the court. All otherclaims have been dismissed. If Mr. Walker believes that additional claims were alleged in the complaint, but not identified by the court, he shall have through May 3, 2023, in which to identify those claims. The clerk is directed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendants (1) Correctional Officer Gary Dickie; (2) Assistant Jail Commander Janosa Laz; (3) Jail Commander Stella Blair; and (4) Deputy Sheriff Kellene Reinke in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint, dkt #1 , applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Order. SEE ORDER. Copy sent distribution list via US Mail. Signed by District Judge Richard L Young on 4/4/23.(JRB)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION FOR ASSISTANCE WITH RECRUITING COUNSEL AND GRANTING MOTION FOR CASE STATUS - Mr. Walker's motion for counsel, dkt. #6 , is denied without prejudice. Mr. Walker may renew his motion after the defendants have answered his complaint by submitting the form motion that the clerk will include with his copy of this Order. Mr. Walker's motion requesting status of case, dkt. #7 , is granted to the extent that Mr. Walker is advised that the court has screened his complaint and ruled on his motion for counsel. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by District Judge Richard L Young on 4/4/23. (Attachments: #1 Counsel Form) (JRB)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Reassignment of Case to Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore. Magistrate Judge Matthew P. brookman is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number, 3:23-cv-00020-RLY-MJD, on all future filings in this matter. (JRB) |
| Filing 7 MOTION Requesting Status of Case, filed by Plaintiff JUSTIN MATTHEW WALKER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Plaintiff JUSTIN MATTHEW WALKER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - No initial partial filing fee is due at this time. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 2/17/23. (JRB)
|
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB) |
| Filing 3 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (JRB) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff JUSTIN MATTHEW WALKER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against STELLA BLAIRE, GARY DICKE, JANOSA LAZ, KELLENE REINKE, filed by JUSTIN MATTHEW WALKER. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Envelope)(JRB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
