TURPIN v. OLD NATIONAL BANK
| MARYETTA TURPIN |
| OLD NATIONAL BANK and SIMPSONS GROCERY STORE |
| 3:2023cv00078 |
| May 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Richard L Young |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 RECEIPT #EV447 for Filing Fee fee in the amount of $402.00, paid by Maryetta Turpin. (JRB) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by MARYETTA TURPIN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LF) |
Filing 5
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff shall have through June 8, 2023, to pay the filing fee to the Clerk of the Court. Failure to do so will result in the dismissal of the action for failure toprosecute and failure to comply with Court orders. Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by District Judge Richard L Young on 5/8/2023. (KAA)
|
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DRB) |
| Filing 3 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DRB) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff MARYETTA TURPIN. (DRB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against OLD NATIONAL BANK, SIMPSONS GROCERY STORE, filed by MARYETTA TURPIN. (No fee paid with this filing) (DRB) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/5/2023: #1 Exhibit) (DRB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
