BROWN et al v. VOS
JOSEPH N. BROWN and CODEY RITCHISON |
L. VOS |
3:2023cv00222 |
December 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Matthew P Brookman |
Crystal S Wildeman |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Mail Returned as undeliverable. #6 Notice of Deficiency, #7 Notice of Deficiency sent to CODEY RITCHISON at Vanderburgh County Detention Center. (AAS) |
Filing 8 Mail Returned as undeliverable - not deliverable as addressed; unable to forward. #4 Notice to Pro se Litigant sent to CODEY RITCHISON at Vanderburgh County Detention Center. (JSR) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Plaintiff Codey Ritchison: Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through February 13, 2024, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the 405.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). A form motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee is being provided for your use. NOTE TO PRISONER - If you seek leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, and you are a prisoner, your motion must be accompanied by a copy of the transactions associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. Copies to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (Attachments: #1 Form Motion for IFP) (MEH) (Main Document 7 replaced on 1/16/2024) (MEH). |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Plaintiff Joseph N. Brown: Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through February 13, 2024, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the 405.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). A form motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee is being provided for your use. NOTE TO PRISONER - If you seek leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, and you are a prisoner, your motion must be accompanied by a copy of the transactions associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. Copies to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (Attachments: #1 Form Motion for IFP) (MEH) Modified on 1/16/2024 (MEH). (Main Document 6 replaced on 1/16/2024) (MEH). |
Filing 5 Mail Returned as undeliverable. #2 Magistrate Judge's Notice of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction and #3 NOTICE to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement sent to CODEY RITCHISON. Return to Sender; Not Deliverable as Addressed; Unable to Forward. (SWM) Modified on 1/2/2024 - per IDOC website - released to Evansville Parole District #4 (MEH). |
Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy to each plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (MEH) |
Filing 3 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DJH) |
Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against L. VOS, filed by JOSEPH N. BROWN and CODEY RITCHISON. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.