WINDERS v. OLSEN
WILLIAM WINDERS |
AMY OLSEN |
3:2024cv00042 |
February 28, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Matthew P Brookman |
Crystal S Wildeman |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 RETURN of Service, filed by WILLIAM WINDERS. AMY OLSEN served on 4/10/2024. (McPhail, Patrick) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant AMY OLSEN. (Spurgeon, J.) |
Filing 11 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by AMY OLSEN. (Spurgeon, J.) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by J. Todd Spurgeon on behalf of Defendant AMY OLSEN. (Spurgeon, J.) |
Filing 9 Case transferred in from Indianapolis Division on 02/28/2024 Case Number 1:24-cv-350. Case assigned to District Judge Matthew P. Brookman and Magistrate Judge Crystal S. Wildeman.(AAS) |
Filing 8 *** PLEASE DISREGARD - DUPLICATE ENTRY *** ORDER GRANTING TRANSFER TO EVANSVILLE DIVISION - For good cause shown, as stated in Plaintiff's motion, it is ordered that this case is hereby transferred to the Evansville Division. Therefore, the clerk is directed to re-docket this action to the Evansville Division. Assignment of judicial officers to the re- docketed action shall be by random draw. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 02/28/2024.(AAS) Modified on 2/28/2024 (AAS). |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #2 TRANSFER TO EVANSVILLE DIVISION - For good cause shown, as stated in Plaintiff's motion, it is ordered that this case is hereby transferred to the Evansville Division. Therefore, the clerk is directed to re-docket this action to the Evansville Division. Assignment of judicial officers to the re- docketed action shall be by random draw. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 02/28/2024. (AAS) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Patrick R. McPhail on behalf of Plaintiff WILLIAM WINDERS. (McPhail, Patrick) |
Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (LBT) |
Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LBT) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to AMY OLSEN. (LBT) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Transfer Case , filed by Plaintiff WILLIAM WINDERS. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(McPhail, Patrick) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages and Demand for Jury Trial against AMY OLSEN, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AINSDC-8042739) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(McPhail, Patrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: WINDERS v. OLSEN | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: WILLIAM WINDERS | |
Represented By: | Patrick R. McPhail |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: AMY OLSEN | |
Represented By: | J. Todd Spurgeon |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.