VAZQUEZ v. O'MALLEY
MANOELA A. VAZQUEZ |
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY |
3:2024cv00163 |
September 9, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Crystal S Wildeman |
Richard L Young |
Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge: IT IS ORDERED: This case is referred to the currently assigned United States magistrate judge to conduct all proceedings and order the entry of a final judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73. Should this case be reassigned to a magistrate judge other than the magistrate judge assigned the date of this order, any attorney or party of record may object within 30 days of such reassignment. If no objection is filed, the consent will remain in effect. PLEASE USE ALTERED CASE NO. 3:24-cv-163-CSW-RLY ON ALL FUTURE FILINGS WITH THIS COURT. See Order. Signed by District Judge Richard L Young on 10/16/2024.(LF) |
Filing 9 JOINT CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by MARTIN J. O'MALLEY. (Woods, Shelese) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Shelese M. Woods on behalf of Defendant MARTIN J. O'MALLEY. (Woods, Shelese) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Elisa Donohoe on behalf of Defendant MARTIN J. O'MALLEY. (Donohoe, Elisa) |
Filing 6 ENTRY GRANTING MOTION FOR IFP STATUS - Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Filing No. #3 ) is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Richard L. Young on 9/10/2024. Copy to the Office of the United States Attorney via US mail. (JSR) |
Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AJG) |
Filing 4 Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summons shall issue. ***TEXT ONLY ENTRY*** (AJG) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Plaintiff MANOELA A. VAZQUEZ. (Marvin, Cody) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Cody Thomas Marvin on behalf of Plaintiff MANOELA A. VAZQUEZ. (Marvin, Cody) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, filed by MANOELA A. VAZQUEZ. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 AC decision, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Marvin, Cody) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: VAZQUEZ v. O'MALLEY | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: MANOELA A. VAZQUEZ | |
Represented By: | Cody Thomas Marvin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY | |
Represented By: | Shelese M. Woods |
Represented By: | Elisa Donohoe |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.