WILLIAMS v. ROHM AND HAAS PENSION PLAN
Case Number: 4:2004cv00078
Filed: April 2, 2004
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: New Albany Office
Presiding Judge: Sarah Evans Barker
Presiding Judge: William G. Hussmann
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 323 ENTRY AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES - The objections to class counsel's attorneys' fees request are OVERRULED. Class counsel's fee and cost reimbursement petition 271 is GRANTED. The Plan therefore shall pay to class counsel for attorneys ' fees the amount of $43,500,000 in accordance with the terms in the parties' settlement agreement. The $5,000 incentive award payable to the named Plaintiff and class representative, Gary Williams, is GRANTED and shall be deducted from the aforementioned fee and cost award. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 11/12/2010. (JLM) Modified on 11/15/2010 (JLM).
June 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 316 ORDER ON MOTION TO RECONSIDER - 301 Class Counsel's Motion for Reconsideration of 293 the Court's 4/21/2010, Order is denied. The Court's order requesting a summary of hours worked and billable rates from the legal professionals w ho worked on this matter on behalf of the class remains in effect. Acknowledging class counsels' need for additional time within which to gather the relevant information, they are hereby granted an additional fourteen days from the date of this order to submit the requested information. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 6/1/2010. (JLM)
April 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 293 ORDER REQUIRING CLASS COUNSEL TO SUBMIT SUMMARY OF LODESTAR FACTORS - The Court requests that the specified information be submitted within 14 days of the date of this order. If good cause considerations prevent compliance with that deadline, counsel may seek leave from the Court for an appropriate extension. See Order for particulars. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 4/21/2010.(JLM) Modified on 4/21/2010 to link to Doc #271 (JLM).
April 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 290 JUDGMENT - Final Judgment is hereby entered. Because the only remaining issue is the award of attorney fees and incentive awards, the amount of which will have no affect on the underlying settlement, there is no just reason to delay and this judgment is therefore the final judgment of the Court. See Judgment for particulars. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 4/12/2010.(JLM)
February 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 192 ENTRY ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION AND RELATED MOTIONS FOR ORAL ARGUMENT - Defendant's two Motions for Oral Argument, 157 and 160 , are denied. Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration 155 and Defendant's Motion for Clarification 158 are also both denied. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 2/11/2009. (JLM)
October 17, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 153 ENTRY ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. 105 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is denied. 117 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendant's Statute of Limitations Affirmative Defense is granted. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 10/17/08. (LBT)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WILLIAMS v. ROHM AND HAAS PENSION PLAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?