LOUIS AND KAREN METRO FAMILY, LLC et al v. LAWRENCEBURG CONSERVANCY et al
| 4:2006cv00177 |
| December 18, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| New Albany Office |
| David Frank Hamilton |
| William G. Hussmann |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
169
ENTRY ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT - The Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Remand 161 is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 166 is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. The parties shall prepare appraisals in compliance with this order, and if they do not agree to resolve the issue of actual value, a HEARING is set for 5/5/2011, at 1:00 PM, New Albany time (EDT), in room #200, United States Cou rthouse, 121 W. Spring Street, New Albany, Indiana before Magistrate Judge William G. Hussmann Jr, at which time the Court will issue a final judgment on the damages aspect of this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Hussmann, Jr on 1/11/2011.(JLM)
|
|
Filing
133
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW and DECISION. Judgment shall enter in this case as to Counts Two and Three of the Second Amended Complaint that this court declares that plaintiff, METRO FAMILY, LLC, is entitled to exercise the option contained i n the Option contract signed 11/30/2001, within 18 months commencing 5/1/2009. Plaintiffs' claims under Court Four of the Second Amended Complaint are DISMISSED. The parties have advised the court that they have resolved their dispute under Court One. It appearing that all matters are now resolved, there is no just reason for delay and a final judgment shall now enter. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Hussmann, Jr on 5/1/2009.(LBT)
|
|
Filing
111
ENTRY on Cross-Motions to Reconsider. 64 Plaintiffs' Motion to Reconsider Breach of Contract Claim at trial and 86 Defendants' Motion to Reconsider Entry of Summary Judgment are GRANTED. Count One of Plaintiffs' Second Amended Co mplaint is DISMISSED. Count Two of Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint remains for trial. The portion of Count Three alleging misrepresentation is DISMISSED. Plaintiffs' claim of Equitable Estoppel remains for trial. Count Four of Plaintiffs' Complaint seeking punitive damages as well as Plaintiffs' claim for attorney's fees are DISMISSED. See Entry for particulars. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Hussmann, Jr on 11/14/08. (LBT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: LOUIS AND KAREN METRO FAMILY, LLC et al v. LAWRENCEBURG CONSERVANCY et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
