CAUFIELD v. COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN
| PAUL CAUFIELD |
| COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN |
| 4:2007cv00016 |
| February 12, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| New Albany Office |
| Clark |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| William G. Hussmann |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
| None |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CAUFIELD v. COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN | |
| Represented By: | Brandi T. Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: PAUL CAUFIELD | |
| Represented By: | Douglas R. Sprong |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
