ENGEBRETSON v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
KATHLEEN ENGEBRETSON |
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA |
4:2009cv00026 |
March 4, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Insurance Office |
Floyd |
Sarah Evans Barker |
William G. Hussmann |
Plaintiff |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER denying 14 Motion to Remand. See Order for particulars. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 6/17/2009. (LBT) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: ENGEBRETSON v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: KATHLEEN ENGEBRETSON | |
Represented By: | Matthew J. Schad |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA | |
Represented By: | Mark E. Schmidtke |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.