APPLIANCE ZONE, LLC v. NEXTAG, INC.

APPLIANCE ZONE, LLC v. NEXTAG, INC.

Plaintiff:	APPLIANCE ZONE, LLC
Defendant:	NEXTAG, INC.
Case Number:	4:2009cv00089
Filed:	June 19, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	New Albany Office
County:	Harrison
Presiding Judge:	Sarah Evans Barker
Presiding Judge:	William G. Hussmann
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 22, 2009	Filing 81 JUDGMENT - In accordance with the Court's Order Granting Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 12/22/2009.(LBT)
August 12, 2009	Filing 36 ORDER on 16 Plaintiff's MOTION for Discovery on Expedited Basis. The Magistrate Judge now RECONSIDERS 30 Order on Motion for Discovery, but concludes that the plaintiff's motion should, in any event, be GRANTED, in part. 30 O rder on Motion for Discovery is RESCINDED and the parties are ORDERED to meet and confer within 10 days of this entry. The subpoenas issued by plaintiff shall stand, and compliance wtih the subpoenas may be enforced by appropriate motion, if necessary. See Order for particulars. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Hussmann, Jr on 8/12/2009.(LBT)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 22, 2009

Filing 81 JUDGMENT - In accordance with the Court's Order Granting Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 12/22/2009.(LBT)

August 12, 2009

Filing 36 ORDER on 16 Plaintiff's MOTION for Discovery on Expedited Basis. The Magistrate Judge now RECONSIDERS 30 Order on Motion for Discovery, but concludes that the plaintiff's motion should, in any event, be GRANTED, in part. 30 O rder on Motion for Discovery is RESCINDED and the parties are ORDERED to meet and confer within 10 days of this entry. The subpoenas issued by plaintiff shall stand, and compliance wtih the subpoenas may be enforced by appropriate motion, if necessary. See Order for particulars. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Hussmann, Jr on 8/12/2009.(LBT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: APPLIANCE ZONE, LLC v. NEXTAG, INC.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: APPLIANCE ZONE, LLC
Represented By:	Jack Allen Wheat
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: NEXTAG, INC.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?