BURCH et al v. KNIGHT et al
Case Number: 4:2009cv00139
Filed: October 29, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
Presiding Judge: Sarah Evans Barker
Presiding Judge: William G. Hussmann
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1981 Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 57 CLOSED JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants STEVE KNIGHT, Floyd County Jail Commander, individually and in his official capacity; FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA; DARRELL MILLS, Floyd County Sheriff, individually and in his official capacity; CARL BANET, Floyd Cou nty Jail Corrections officer, individually; EDDIE MAYFIELD, Floyd County Sheriff's Department Transport Officer, individually, and JOHN/JANE DOE(S), Floyd County Correctional Officers, individually in their official and individual capacities and against Plaintiffs, the ESTATE OF JESSICA BURCH, deceased; MARTINA DILLON, individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Jessica Burch; K.J.R., a minor child of Jessica Burch, individually, and D.R.B., a minor child of Jessica Burch, individually, each side to bear its own fees and costs. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 1/20/2012.(LBT)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BURCH et al v. KNIGHT et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?