PARKER v. KREINHOP et al
| GERID ALLEN PARKER |
| CORPAL JERRY KINNETT, SERGANT AMY VANCE and SHERIFF MIKE KREINHOP |
| 4:2011cv00026 |
| March 9, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| New Albany Office |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| William G. Hussmann |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
ENTRY DISCUSSING COMPLAINT, DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - Certain of Parker's claims are legally insufficient and must be dismissed. The claims against defendants Sgt. Amy Vance and Sheriff Mike Kreinhop are dism issed. The clerk is designated to issue and serve process on the defendant Jerry Kinnett. Process in this case shall consist of the complaint, applicable forms and this Entry. The plaintiff has failed to sign the Complaint. The plaintiff shall ha ve through 2/28/2012, in which to file a statement with the court affirming and adopting the complaint as his as of the date it was filed. Failure to do so may lead to the dismissal of this action. The clerk is directed to include a copy of the complaint along with the plaintiff's copy of this Entry. MIKE KREINHOP and AMY VANCE terminated. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 1/18/2012.(JLM) Modified on 1/19/2012 (JLM).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
