MURRAY v. CARLSON et al
REVEREND LISA MARIA MURRAY |
CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, JULIA CATONE, DALE CARLSON, CURTIS M. CARLSON and BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER OF CLARK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL |
4:2011cv00042 |
April 14, 2011 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
New Albany Office |
Sarah Evans Barker |
William G. Hussmann |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 73 ORDER OF DISMISSAL - Plaintiff's remaining claims in this action, including her state law claims such as they are, are hereby dismissed with prejudice based on her failure to prosecute this case. A separate judgment in favor of Curtis M. Carlson shall issue. Copy sent to Curtis Carlson via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 10/30/2013.(JLM) |
Filing 65 ENTRY ON PENDING MATTERS AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Now before the Court are: 50 Defendant Behavioral Health Center's Motion to Dismiss; 52 Defendant Julia C. Catone's Motion to Dismiss; and 58 Defendant Clark County Sheriff Departmen t's Motion to Dismiss. All three motions to dismiss are GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims in this action against the Behavioral Health Center, Julia C. Catone, and the Clark County Sheriff's Department are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A sepa rate judgment shall issue. Plaintiff shall have through and including 8/2/2013 to support the continuation of this litigation against Mr. Carlson or to explain why Mr. Carlson should not immediately be dismissed as a defendant in this action. Copy sent to Curtis M. Carlson via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 7/24/2013.(JLM) |
Filing 22 ENTRY ON PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO SHOW CAUSE ORDER - The Court attempts to be reasonable in response to parties and their counsel when unexpected personal issues arise, but the forbearance required in this case exceeds all reasonable bounds. We shall thus allow Plaintiff one final extension of time, not to extend beyond 6/15/2012, within which to comply with the Entries at 7 and 8 as well as the applicable federal and local rules of procedure. Further noncompliance will result in a dismissal with prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and Local Rule 41-1. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 5/14/2012.(JLM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.