CMH HOMES, INC. v. TAYLOR et al
Plaintiff: CMH HOMES, INC.
Defendant: KEVIN R. TAYLOR and MADONNA L. TAYLOR
Case Number: 4:2012cv00103
Filed: August 27, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: New Albany Office
Presiding Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Presiding Judge: William G. Hussmann
Nature of Suit: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 28:185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Jury Demanded By: None
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CMH HOMES, INC. v. TAYLOR et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CMH HOMES, INC.
Represented By: Larry C. Deener
Represented By: Christopher S. Randolph, Jr.
Represented By: PRO HAC VICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KEVIN R. TAYLOR
Represented By: Samuel Duncan Krahulik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MADONNA L. TAYLOR
Represented By: Samuel Duncan Krahulik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?