LOVE et al v. PENCE
Plaintiff: JENNIFER REDMOND, MELISSA LOVE, JANA KOHORST, MICHAEL DRURY, JO ANN DALE, ERIN BROCK, LANE STUMLER and CAROL UEBELHOER
Defendant: MICHAEL RICHARD PENCE
Case Number: 4:2014cv00015
Filed: March 7, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: New Albany Office
Presiding Judge: Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge: Richard L. Young
Nature of Suit: Constitutional - State Statute
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ENTRY on Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider - In light of the new evidence, the court reinstates the married Plaintiffs' claims that Section 31-11-1-1(b) are unconstitutional. The claims brought by the unmarried Plaintiffs remain dismissed, because the Governor cannot remedy the harms alleged by them. 35 Motion for Reconsideration is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. As a resulte, the court also VACATES its 33 Entry on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary and Permanent Injunctive Relief, which had denied that motion as moot. See Entry for details. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 9/16/2014. (LBT)
June 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ENTRY ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS - 18 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is GRANTED. See Entry for details. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 6/25/2014. (LBT)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LOVE et al v. PENCE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JENNIFER REDMOND
Represented By: Daniel J. Canon
Represented By: L. Joe Dunman
Represented By: Dawn R. Elliott
Represented By: Shannon Fauver
Represented By: Laura Elizabeth Landenwich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MELISSA LOVE
Represented By: Daniel J. Canon
Represented By: L. Joe Dunman
Represented By: Dawn R. Elliott
Represented By: Shannon Fauver
Represented By: Laura Elizabeth Landenwich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JANA KOHORST
Represented By: Daniel J. Canon
Represented By: L. Joe Dunman
Represented By: Dawn R. Elliott
Represented By: Shannon Fauver
Represented By: Laura Elizabeth Landenwich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MICHAEL DRURY
Represented By: Laura Elizabeth Landenwich
Represented By: Shannon Fauver
Represented By: Dawn R. Elliott
Represented By: L. Joe Dunman
Represented By: Daniel J. Canon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JO ANN DALE
Represented By: Laura Elizabeth Landenwich
Represented By: Shannon Fauver
Represented By: Dawn R. Elliott
Represented By: L. Joe Dunman
Represented By: Daniel J. Canon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ERIN BROCK
Represented By: Laura Elizabeth Landenwich
Represented By: Shannon Fauver
Represented By: Dawn R. Elliott
Represented By: L. Joe Dunman
Represented By: Daniel J. Canon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LANE STUMLER
Represented By: Daniel J. Canon
Represented By: L. Joe Dunman
Represented By: Dawn R. Elliott
Represented By: Shannon Fauver
Represented By: Laura Elizabeth Landenwich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CAROL UEBELHOER
Represented By: Daniel J. Canon
Represented By: L. Joe Dunman
Represented By: Dawn R. Elliott
Represented By: Shannon Fauver
Represented By: Laura Elizabeth Landenwich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL RICHARD PENCE
Represented By: Thomas M. Fisher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?