MARQUETTE BANK v. BROWN et al
| MARQUETTE BANK |
| DEBRA JO BROWN, MEEGAN COLLIER, MICHAEL COLLIER, MELINDA GABBARD, JOHN D. GAY, RUTHY LARGE and BRENDA R. LEE |
| 4:2014cv00034 |
| April 28, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| New Albany Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS - 27 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim with respect to Count I is GRANTED as to Defendants Debra Jo Brown, Melinda Gabbard, Brenda R. Lee and Ruthy Large, and DENIED as to Defendant John Ga y. With respect to Count II, the motion is GRANTED as to Defendants John Gay and Ruthy Large, and DENIED as to Defendants Debra Jo Brown, Melinda Gabbard and Brenda Lee. 29 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim with respect to Court I i s GRANTED as to Meegan Collier and DENIED as to Michael Collier. With respect to Count II, the motion is GRANTED as to Michael Collier and DENIED as to Meegan Collier. Remaining before us are Count I's claim for fraud against Michael Collier and John Gay, and Count II's claim for unjust enrichment against Debra Jo Brown, Melinda Gabbard, Brenda R. Lee, and Meegan Collier. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/31/2015. (LBT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
