PENICK v. CLARK COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT et al
Plaintiff: ANTOYNE MAURICE PENICK
Defendant: CLARK COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, ROBERT DOOLEY and JAMEY NOEL
Case Number: 4:2015cv00162
Filed: November 20, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: New Albany Office
Presiding Judge: Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Entry Denying Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, Denying Request for Counsel, and Dismissing Complaint - Plaintiff Antoyne Penick's duplicative motions 3 and 4 to proceed in forma pauperis are denied as presented. He shall have until Decemb er 21, 2015, in which renew his motion to proceed in forma pauperis by attaching a copy of the transactions associated with his institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action on November 20, 2015. See 42 U.S.C. & #167; 1915(a)(2). Otherwise, he must pay the $400.00 filing fee. Mr. Pennick filed a letter with his complaint in which he requests counsel from the Court. This motion is denied, as the defendants have not been served. Mr. Penick's complain t must be dismissed for the reasons set forth above, however, this will not lead to the entry of final judgment at this time. Instead, Mr. Penick shall have through December 21, 2015, in which to show cause why final judgment consistent with this Entry should not issue. See Entry for details. Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 11/23/2015. (MAG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PENICK v. CLARK COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CLARK COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROBERT DOOLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JAMEY NOEL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ANTOYNE MAURICE PENICK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?