LILLY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

LILLY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff:	RAYMOND LILLY
Defendant:	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number:	4:2017cv00010
Filed:	January 13, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	New Albany Office
Presiding Judge:	Debra McVicker Lynch
Presiding Judge:	Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit:	P.I.: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 10, 2020	Filing 107 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND RULING FOLLOWING BENCH TRIAL - The Court concludes that Defendant United States of America is liable to Plaintiff Raymond Lilly on his claim of negligence, and Mr. Lilly is entitled to a damages award in the amount of $899,833.19. Final judgment consistent with this Entry will issue under separate order (See Order). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/10/2020.(TMC)
November 28, 2018	Filing 68 ORDER ON MOTION TO LIMIT EXPERT OPINIONS - 48 Motion to Limit Expert Opinions is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Motion is denied as to the treating physicians and the maintenance and safety professionals, but it is granted as to William Cochran, the OSHA area director. Cochran may not testify at trial unless Lilly first satisfies all the requirements of 29 C.F.R. §§ 2.20-2.25. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 11/28/2018. (LBT)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 10, 2020

Filing 107 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND RULING FOLLOWING BENCH TRIAL - The Court concludes that Defendant United States of America is liable to Plaintiff Raymond Lilly on his claim of negligence, and Mr. Lilly is entitled to a damages award in the amount of $899,833.19. Final judgment consistent with this Entry will issue under separate order (See Order). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/10/2020.(TMC)

November 28, 2018

Filing 68 ORDER ON MOTION TO LIMIT EXPERT OPINIONS - 48 Motion to Limit Expert Opinions is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Motion is denied as to the treating physicians and the maintenance and safety professionals, but it is granted as to William Cochran, the OSHA area director. Cochran may not testify at trial unless Lilly first satisfies all the requirements of 29 C.F.R. §§ 2.20-2.25. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 11/28/2018. (LBT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LILLY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: RAYMOND LILLY
Represented By:	REMINGER CO., LPA - College Park
Represented By:	Nicholas Gene Brunette
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?