NEW HORIZONS REHABILITATION, INC. v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
Plaintiff: NEW HORIZONS REHABILITATION, INC.
Defendant: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and STATE OF INDIANA
Case Number: 4:2017cv00049
Filed: March 14, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: New Albany Office
Presiding Judge: Debra McVicker Lynch
Presiding Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part 60 Motion for Summary Judgment. Summary judgment is granted on New Horizons' claims for failure to accommodate and disparate treatment under the ADA, F HAA, and Rehabilitation Act. Summary judgment is denied on New Horizons' Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection claim. The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part 66 Motion for Summary Judgment. Summary judgment is denied as to New Horizons& #039; claims for failure to accommodate and disparate treatment under the ADA, FHAA, and Rehabilitation Act and it is granted on Defendants' Cross-Motion as to New Horizons Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection claim. The Court permanently enjo ins the Defendants from treating New Horizons' Lawrenceburg, Indiana home as a Class 1 structure or imposing on it any of the costs or burdens associated with Class 1 structures. The Court awards New Horizons damages in the amount of $30,400.00. This Order resolves all claims as to all parties. Final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 will issue in a separate order. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/19/2019. (LBT)
October 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ENTRY GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION - 7 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED. New Horizons is entitled to designation as a Class 2 structure and waiver of the fire suppression system during the pendency of these proceedings. See Entry for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/27/2017. (LBT)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NEW HORIZONS REHABILITATION, INC. v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Represented By: Kyle Charles Fletcher
Represented By: Jefferson S. Garn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STATE OF INDIANA
Represented By: Kyle Charles Fletcher
Represented By: Jefferson S. Garn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NEW HORIZONS REHABILITATION, INC.
Represented By: Kenneth J. Falk
Represented By: Jan P. Mensz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?