HUNTER v. CLARK COUNTY INDIANA et al
| ANTONE LAVELLE HUNTER |
| CLARK CIRCUIT COURT #1, CLARK COUNTY INDIANA and ZYNTHIA McCRITE |
| 4:2017cv00071 |
| April 24, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| New Albany Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
ENTRY Denying Motion for In Forma Pauperis Status, Dismissing Complaint, and Directing Plaintiff to Show Cause - 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED without prejudice because he failed to submit a certified copy of his trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint on April 24, 2017, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). He shall have through May 30, 2017, in which to either pay t he $400.00 filing fee or renew his request for in forma pauperis status with the required information. The Court has screened the complaint and found no viable claim, even under the most liberal construction. The complaint is therefore dismissed . Before the action is dismissed in its entirety, plaintiff shall have through May 30, 2017, in which to show cause why judgment consistent with this Entry should not issue. See Entry for details. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 5/2/2017 (copy mailed to plaintiff). (LBT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
