AMERICAN HOME HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. v. FLOYD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SERVICES et al
Plaintiff: AMERICAN HOME HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
Defendant: BAPTIST HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC. and FLOYD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SERVICES
Counter Defendant: AMERICAN HOME HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
Counter Claimant: FLOYD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SERVICES
Case Number: 4:2017cv00089
Filed: May 23, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: New Albany Office
Presiding Judge: Debra McVicker Lynch
Presiding Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Anti-Trust
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 123 ENTRY GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - The Court GRANTS the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. (Filing No. 98 .) Defendants' Motion to Limit and Exclude Expert Testimony (Filing No. 96 ) is DENIED. American& #039;s Motion to Exclude Daniel Sullivan's Expert Opinions Concerning the Relevant Geographic Market (Filing No. 103 ) is DENIED. Defendants' unopposed Motion for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority (Filing No. 121 ) is GRANTED. This Order resolves all pending motions before the Court and all claims against all parties in this suit. Final judgment will issue in a separate order (See Order). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/26/2020. (TMC)
March 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ENTRY ON MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM - 30 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is DENIED. 38 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is GRANTED as to Count I of the Counterclaim, Tortious Inte rference with Existing Contractual Relations and Count II of the Counterclaim, Tortious Interference with Business Relationships. 38 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as to Count III of the Counterclaim, Defamation. The dismissal of Count II of the Cou nterclaim is without prejudice, as the Court GRANTS Floyd Hospital leave to amend Count II, Tortious Interference with Business Relationships (Filing No. 29). The Amended Counterclaim, if any, should be filed within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. If no Amended Counterclaim is filed, the claims remaining for trial are: Count I of the Complaint, Attempted Monopolization; Count II of the Complaint, Tortious Interference with Contractual Relations; and Count III of the Complaint, Tortious Interference with Prospective Business Relations; Count III of the Counter complaint, Defamation. See Entry for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/5/2018. (LBT)
May 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr. on 5/23/2017: Defendant Floyd's Motion to Transfer 13 and Defendant Baptist Healthcare's Motion to Transfer 14 are GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to transfer the above-captioned action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, New Albany Division. Case Terminated. cc: Counsel, USDC- SDIN (JBM) [Transferred from Kentucky Western on 5/23/2017.]
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: AMERICAN HOME HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. v. FLOYD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SERVICES et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: AMERICAN HOME HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
Represented By: Casey L. Hinkle
Represented By: David S. Kaplan
Represented By: KAPLAN & PARTNERS LLP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AMERICAN HOME HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
Represented By: Casey L. Hinkle
Represented By: David S. Kaplan
Represented By: KAPLAN & PARTNERS LLP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BAPTIST HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC.
Represented By: Douglas B. Bates
Represented By: Rodney Lee Scott
Represented By: Chelsea R. Stanley
Represented By: Richard A. Vance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FLOYD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SERVICES
Represented By: Douglas B. Bates
Represented By: Rodney Lee Scott
Represented By: Chelsea R. Stanley
Represented By: Richard A. Vance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: FLOYD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SERVICES
Represented By: Douglas B. Bates
Represented By: Rodney Lee Scott
Represented By: Chelsea R. Stanley
Represented By: Richard A. Vance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?