BAY v. GOLDEN CORRAL CORPORATION et al
| EDWARD R. BAY |
| GOLDEN CORRAL CORPORATION, JUDY IRWIN, LISA SCHWEICKERT, RICK SMITH and MICHEAL WILKERSON |
| 4:2018cv00011 |
| January 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| New Albany Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Richard L. Young |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ENTRY ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - Bays failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact on his age discrimination claim. Accordingly, Golden Corral's motion for summary judgment (Filing No. 45 ) is GRANTED. See entry for details. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 7/30/2019 (copy mailed to Edward Bay). (TMC)
|
|
Filing
27
ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS JUDY IRWIN, MICHAEL WILKERSON, AND LISA SCHWEICKERT - Because the Individual Defendants do not meet the definition of "employer" under the ADEA, and a lawsuit against them is redundant to the suit against Golden Corral, Plaintiff's complaint fails to state a plausible claim for relief against the Individual Defendants. Accordingly, 14 Motion to Dismiss Judy Irwin, Michael Wilkerson, and Lisa Schweickert is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against Golden Corral remain. See Entry for details. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 6/12/2018. (LBT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
