COYLE NISSAN, LLC v. NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.
| COYLE NISSAN, LLC |
| NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC. |
| 4:2018cv00075 |
| May 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| New Albany Office |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
351
ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S BILL OF COSTS AND PARTIES' POST-TRIAL MOTIONS - The Court DENIES Coyle's Motion to Amend Final Judgment (Filing No. 335 ) and Coyle's Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Filing No. 336 ). The Cou rt GRANTS in part NNA's Bill of Costs (Filing No. 334 ), and the Clerk is directed to tax costs against Coyle in favor of NNA in the amount of $23,056.25. Furthermore, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part NNA's Motion to Amend Judgment and Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Filing No. 337 ). Judgment as a matter of law is denied, but the Court amends the Final Judgment to reinstate the declaratory judgment counterclaim and to declare that Coyle breached the parties' Agreement. An amended final judgment will issue under separate order. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/31/2023. (JRB)
|
|
Filing
289
ORDER denying 286 Motion for Leave to File Motion for Summary Judgment. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/15/2022. (JRB)
|
|
Filing
228
ORDER ON MOTION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 54(B) - For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff Coyle Nissan, LLC's Motion for Entry of Final Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) (Filing No. 218 ) is DENIED (See Order). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 12/2/2021. (TMC)
|
|
Filing
212
ENTRY ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - Defendant Nissan North America, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment, (Filing No. 108 ), is GRANTED. Summary judgment is entered in favor of NNA on Coyle's claims for breach of contract (Count I), breach of the covenant of good faith under California law (Count III), violation of Indiana Code § 23-2-2.7-2(1)(iv) (Count V), violation of Indiana Code § 23-2-2.7-2(5) (Count VI), violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1221 (Count X), violation of the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13(a) (Count XI), and declaratory judgment (Count XII). This Order does not address or resolve the supplemental pleadings and the counterclaims filed by the parties at Filing No. 167 -1 and Filing No. 198 after the summary judgment briefing had been completed. No final judgment will enter at this time as the counterclaims remain pending (See Entry). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/21/2021.(TRG)
|
|
Filing
166
ENTRY ON MOTIONS CONCERNING THE SUMMARY JUDGMENT RECORD - For the reasons explained above, the Motion for Leave to Supplement the Record (Filing No. 142 ) is GRANTED, and the Motion to Strike Extraneous Exhibits (Filing No. 145 ) is DENIED. Coyle's surreply brief and surreply evidence filed at Filing No. 152 and Filing No. 153 are stricken from the record (See Entry). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/22/2021. (TMC)
|
|
Filing
98
ORDER - 91 First MOTION for Extension of Time to August 31, 2020 to Produce Expert Report is GRANTED. Defendant's expert witness disclosure deadline is enlarged to September 30, 2020 (See Order). Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 8/10/2020. (TMC) Modified on 8/11/2020 to reflect EGOV filing (TMC).
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS - 49 NNA's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Count I (the breach of contract claim) was not addressed in the Motion to Dismiss and will proceed. C ounts II, IV, VII, VIII, and IX are dismissed. Counts III, V, VI, X, and XI may proceed. To the extent that Count XII seeks a declaratory judgment regarding the Indiana Deceptive Franchise Practices Act, that claim also may proceed. 63 NNA's Motion for Oral Argument on the Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. 65 NNA's Motion for Leave to File Response to Notice of Supplemental Authority is GRANTED. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/26/2020. (LBT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: COYLE NISSAN, LLC v. NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: COYLE NISSAN, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey B. Halbert |
| Represented By: | Ronald C. Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC. | |
| Represented By: | William C. Wagner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
