RIPLEY COUNTY v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
| RIPLEY COUNTY |
| MCKESSON CORPORATION, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC. F/K/A WATSON PHARMA, INC., PURDUE PHARMA L.P., MALLINCKRODT LLC, MALLINCKRODT PLC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. N/K/A ACTAVIS, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC., ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. N/K/A JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., CARDINAL HEALTH, INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA, INC. N/K/A JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., THE PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY, INC., WATSON LABORATORIES, INC., CEPHALON, INC., ACTAVIS, LLC, ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ALLERGAN PLC F/K/A ACTAVIS PLS, NORAMCO, INC., PURDUE PHARMA INC., ALLERGAN PLC, ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA, INC. and ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. |
| 4:2018cv00175 |
| September 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Remark - The Southern District of Indiana receives email notice from the Clerk of the Northern District of Ohio in regarding electronic case transfer. This case was received electronically by the Northern District of Ohio on 10/18/2018 and was assigned case number 1:18-op-46155 in the receiving court. (MAC) |
| Filing 11 Transfer Letter to Clerk of the Northern District of Ohio. Case transferred electronically to Northern District of Ohio, IN RE: MDL 2804 on October 18, 2018. (MAC) |
| Filing 10 CLOSED TRANSFER to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. IN RE: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION MDL No. 2804 Per Certified Transfer Order (CTO-59). (MAC) |
| Filing 9 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LBT) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., ACTAVIS, LLC, ALLERGAN PLC, AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORPORATION, CARDINAL HEALTH, INC., CEPHALON, INC., ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC., ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA, INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, MALLINCKRODT LLC, MALLINCKRODT PLC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, NORAMCO, INC., ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., PURDUE PHARMA INC., PURDUE PHARMA L.P., TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., THE PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY, INC., WATSON LABORATORIES, INC., WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (LBT) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Andrew Knoll on behalf of Plaintiff RIPLEY COUNTY. (Knoll, Jonathan) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Lynn A. Toops on behalf of Plaintiff RIPLEY COUNTY. (Toops, Lynn) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Vess Allen Miller on behalf of Plaintiff RIPLEY COUNTY. (Miller, Vess) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeff S. Gibson on behalf of Plaintiff RIPLEY COUNTY. (Gibson, Jeff) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Irwin B. Levin on behalf of Plaintiff RIPLEY COUNTY. (Levin, Irwin) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard E. Shevitz on behalf of Plaintiff RIPLEY COUNTY. (Shevitz, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by RIPLEY COUNTY. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5075896) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Shevitz, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
