ATKINS v. BERRYHILL
| ISAAC S. ATKINS |
| NANCY A. BERRYHILL |
| 4:2018cv00193 |
| October 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Richard L Young |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 TRANSCRIPT of Administrative Record of Social Security Administration, by NANCY A. BERRYHILL. (Attachments: #1 court transcript index, #2 administrative documents, #3 payment documents, #4 jurisdictional documents part 1, #5 jurisdictional documents part 2, #6 non disability related documents, #7 disability related documents part 1, #8 disability related documents part 2, #9 medical records)(Wierenga, Julian) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time, filed by Defendant NANCY A. BERRYHILL. (Wierenga, Julian) |
Filing 7
ORDER on Motion for Appointment of Counsel - Mr. Atkins's motion for appointment of counsel (Dkt. #3 ) is DENIED. There currently are no deadlines in this case. A deadline for Mr. Atkins to file a brief about what the Social Security Administration did wrong in deciding he was not disabled will be set after the Agency files the administrative record. The administrative record likely will be filed in about two months. In the meantime, Mr. Atkins should work hard to find an attorney to assist him and to provide attorneys with full information about his disability claim and the reasons benefits were denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 11/9/2018. Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (MAT)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Julian Clifford Wierenga on behalf of Defendant NANCY A. BERRYHILL. (Wierenga, Julian) |
| Filing 5 ENTRY - Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 10/22/2018. Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (MAT) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LBT) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Plaintiff ISAAC S. ATKINS. (Attachments: #1 Financial Affidavit, #2 Envelope)(LBT) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff ISAAC S. ATKINS. (Attachments: #1 Financial Affidavit, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Text of Proposed Order, #4 Envelope)(LBT) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NANCY A. BERRYHILL, filed by ISAAC S. ATKINS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Appeals Council Documents, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Envelope)(LBT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ATKINS v. BERRYHILL | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL | |
| Represented By: | Julian Clifford Wierenga |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ISAAC S. ATKINS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
