DAVIS v. NEW ALBANY INDIANA et al
| MICHAEL C. DAVIS |
| NEW ALBANY INDIANA and WALMART SUPERCENTER |
| 4:2019cv00076 |
| April 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CLOSED JUDGMENT - The Court having this day made its Entry directing the entry of final judgment, the Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT. The action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/20/2019 (copy mailed to plaintiff).(LBT) (Main Document 9 replaced on 6/21/2019) (LBT). |
Filing 8
ENTRY DISMISSING ACTION AND DIRECTING ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT - For the reasons discussed in the screening Entry (Filing No. #4 ), this action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). Plaintiff's Motion for Assistance with Recruiting Counsel (Filing No. #5 ) is denied as moot. Final judgment consistent with this Entry will be issued under separate order. See Entry for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/20/2019 (copy mailed to plaintiff).(LBT)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S #6 REQUEST FOR COPIES - The motion is granted insofar as directed. The clerk provided Mr. Davis one blank civil rights complaint form with its ruling in case 4:19-cv-00077-JMS-DML. The clerk provided Mr. Davis one blank form for a notice of appeal and declaration of inmate filing with its ruling in case 4:19-cv-00077-JMS-DML. Mr. Davis's request for the Court to send copies of filings prior to May 21, 2019, to his sister is denied. The cases Mr. Davis has filed are: Davis v. New Albany, Indiana, No. 4:19-00076-TWP-DML; Davis v. Loop et al., No. 4:19-cv-00077-JMS-DML; Davis v. New Albany, Indiana, Police Dep't, No. 4:19-00078-TWP-DML; Davis v. Griffin, No. 4:19-00085-TWP-DML (case closed 05/29/2019); Davis v. Floyd County Office Dep't of Child Services; 4:19-00086-TWP-DML (closed 05/29/2019); Davis v. Geron, No. 4:19-cv-00109-TWP-DML. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/12/2019. (JRB)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION Requesting Copies, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL C. DAVIS. (LBT) |
| (CONTINUATION OF NO. 6) NOTICE of Change of Address for MICHAEL C. DAVIS. (LBT) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Assistance with Recruiting Counsel, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL C. DAVIS. (LBT) |
|
Filing 4
ENTRY GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, SCREENING AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - For the reasons stated above, Davis's Non-Prisoner Request to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying the Filing Fee (Filing No. #2 ) is GRANTED. Having screened the Complaint, the Court finds it is subject to dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Davis is granted leave to file an amended complaint by no later than Friday, May 31, 2019. If no amended complaint is filed by that date, this action will be dismissed for the reasons set forth above. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/16/2019. Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (MAT)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (MAT) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL C. DAVIS. (MAT) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NEW ALBANY INDIANA, WALMART SUPERCENTER, filed by MICHAEL C. DAVIS. (No fee paid with this filing) (MAT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
