DAVIS v. LOOP et al
MICHAEL C. DAVIS |
FRANK LOOP and FURMAN |
4:2019cv00077 |
April 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by All Defendants.(Lowe, R.) |
|
Filing 11 MOTION Requesting Copies, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL C. DAVIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LBT) |
(CONTINUATION OF NO. 11) NOTICE of Change of Address for MICHAEL C. DAVIS. (LBT) |
|
Filing 9 MOTION for Assistance with Recruiting Counsel, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL C. DAVIS. (LBT) |
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by FURMAN, FRANK LOOP. FURMAN waiver sent on 4/25/2019; FRANK LOOP waiver sent on 4/25/2019. (Lowe, R.) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by R. Jeffrey Lowe on behalf of Defendants FURMAN, FRANK LOOP. (Lowe, R.) |
|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Request for Waiver of Service of Summons Issued by Clerk as to Floyd County Sheriff Frank Loop and Captain Furman. (LBT) |
|
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (MAT) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL C. DAVIS. (MAT) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FURMAN, FRANK LOOP, filed by MICHAEL C. DAVIS. (No fee paid with this filing) (MAT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.