DAVIS v. GRIFFIN et al
MICHAEL C. DAVIS |
SAMANTHA GRIFFIN, SUPERIOR COURT 3 and FLOYD COUNTY INDIANA |
4:2019cv00085 |
April 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 10 (CONTINUATION OF NO. 9) NOTICE of Change of Address for MICHAEL C. DAVIS. (LBT) |
Filing 9 MOTION Requesting Copies, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL C. DAVIS. (LBT) |
Filing 8 CLOSED JUDGMENT - The Court having this day made its Entry directing the entry of final judgment, the Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT. The action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/29/2019 (copy mailed to plaintiff).(LBT) |
|
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against FLOYD COUNTY INDIANA, SAMANTHA GRIFFIN, SUPERIOR COURT 3, filed by MICHAEL C. DAVIS.(LBT) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Assistance with Recruiting Counsel, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL C. DAVIS. (LBT) |
|
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (MAT) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL C. DAVIS. (MAT) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FLOYD COUNTY INDIANA, SAMANTHA GRIFFIN, SUPERIOR COURT 3, filed by MICHAEL C. DAVIS. (No fee paid with this filing) (MAT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.