LUKE v. SHERIFF
| BILLY LUKE |
| SHERIFF |
| 4:2019cv00105 |
| May 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by SHERIFF.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - CCS, #2 Exhibit B - DA Dkt., #3 Exhibit C - DA Appellant's, #4 Exhibit D - DA Appellee's, #5 Exhibit E - DA Reply, #6 Exhibit F - DA Opinion, #7 Exhibit G - DA Pet. to Trans., #8 Exhibit H - DA Trans. Resp., #9 Exhibit I - PCR CCS, #10 Exhibit J - Offender Information System, #11 Exhibit K - CCS)(Drum, Jesse) Modified on 7/3/2019 to change to motion event (LBT). |
Filing 8
ORDER denying #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel - SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/12/2019. (JRB)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Jesse R. Drum on behalf of Respondent SHERIFF. (Drum, Jesse) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (State Conviction) - Billy Luke's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges the petitioner's conviction and sentence in Indiana state court case number 15C01-1402-FC-0019. Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted. Respondent is ORDERED to enter an appearance by 5/31/2019. If respondent argues that all claims in the petition are subject to one of the procedural bars for dismissal outlined in Rule 5(b), respondent is ORDERED to file a motion to dismiss based on a complete procedural bar by 7/2/2019. If Track 1 does not apply, respondent is ORDERED to answer the petition by 7/23/2019. The Court does not anticipate extending respondent's deadlines absent respondent specifically setting forth extraordinary circumstances (SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DEADLINES). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/28/2019 (copy mailed to petitioner).(LBT)
|
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (MAT) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Intent to Amend Original Petition, filed by Petitioner BILLY LUKE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (MAT) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Petitioner BILLY LUKE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(MAT) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Petitioner BILLY LUKE. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Trust Account, #2 Envelope)(MAT) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by BILLY LUKE. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(MAT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: LUKE v. SHERIFF | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: SHERIFF | |
| Represented By: | Jesse R. Drum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: BILLY LUKE | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
