DOSS v. FARIAS et al
| VALCHAS LAMONT DOSS, SR. |
| INDIANA STATE POLICE, SMITH, MEARS and BRANDON FARIAS |
| 4:2020cv00020 |
| January 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
CLOSED DISMISSED - The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this matter pending the resolution of the Floyd County criminal proceedings against Mr. Doss under the Cause Number 22D01-1910-F5-002122. Mr. Doss is ORDERED to provide the Court with notice within seven days of the resolution of the criminal proceeding so that this matter may be reopened and move forward accordingly (See Order). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/30/2020 (Copy mailed per distribution list).(TMC)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (TMC) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff VALCHAS LAMONT DOSS, SR. (Attachments: #1 Trust Account Summary, #2 Envelope)(TMC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BRANDON FARIAS, INDIANA STATE POLICE, MEARS, SMITH, filed by VALCHAS LAMONT DOSS, SR. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(TMC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
