KEITH v. SAUL
Plaintiff: PHILLIP L KEITH and PHILLIP L. KEITH
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Case Number: 4:2020cv00162
Filed: July 24, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Debra McVicker Lynch
Referring Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to 11/23/2020 to File the Electronic Certified Administrative Record and Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant should anticipate no further extensions. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/16/2020. (TMC)
September 15, 2020 Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to 11/23/2020 (unopposed) to file Electronic Certified Administrative Record and Answer Plaintiff's Complaint, filed by Defendant ANDREW M. SAUL. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Payne, Lindsay) Modified on 9/16/2020 to edit document title (TMC).
September 8, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Lindsay Beyer Payne on behalf of Defendant ANDREW M. SAUL. (Payne, Lindsay)
August 13, 2020 Filing 6 RECEIPT #IP070328 for civil filing fee in the amount of $400.00, paid by Christopher Harrell on behalf of the plaintiff. (AKH)
July 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER - #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Plaintiff must pay the filing and administrative fee, totaling $400, by the end of the day, August 31, 2020. Failure to pay the fees may result in the case being dismissed (See Order). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/27/2020 (Copy mailed per distribution list). (TMC)
July 27, 2020 Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (TMC)
July 24, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher M. Harrell on behalf of Plaintiff PHILLIP L KEITH. (Harrell, Christopher)
July 24, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Plaintiff PHILLIP L KEITH. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order to Proceed In Forma Pauperis)(Harrell, Christopher)
July 24, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDREW M. SAUL, filed by PHILLIP L KEITH. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Harrell, Christopher)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KEITH v. SAUL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PHILLIP L KEITH
Represented By: Christopher M. Harrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PHILLIP L. KEITH
Represented By: Christopher M. Harrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Represented By: Lindsay Beyer Payne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?