FORREST v. FLOYD CO. COMM. CORRECTIONS et al
Plaintiff: MARQUITA FORREST
Defendant: FLOYD CO. COMM. CORRECTIONS and TERRANCE CODY
Case Number: 4:2020cv00175
Filed: August 12, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Debra McVicker Lynch
Referring Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2020 Filing 7 CLOSED JUDGMENT - The Court having this day issued its Entry directing the entry of final judgment, now enters FINAL JUDGMENT and this action is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/7/2020 (Copy mailed per distribution list).(TMC)
October 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order Dismissing Action and Directing Entry of Final Judgment - Consistent with the Order of August 14, 2020, this action is now dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Judgment consistent with this Order shall now issue (See Order). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/7/2020 (Copy mailed per distribution list).(TMC)
August 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order Granting Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, Screening Complaint, and Directing Plaintiff to Show Cause - #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Plaintiff still must pay the three hundred and fifty dollar ($350.00) filing fee. The complaint is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). Plaintiff will have through September 14, 2020, to show cause why this action should not be dismissed (See Order). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/14/2020 (Copy mailed per distribution list). (TMC)
August 13, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC)
August 12, 2020 Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (TMC)
August 12, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff MARQUITA FORREST. (TMC)
August 12, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TERRANCE CODY, FLOYD CO. COMM. CORRECTIONS, filed by MARQUITA FORREST. (No fee paid with this filing) (TMC) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/12/2020: #1 Exhibit) (TMC).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FORREST v. FLOYD CO. COMM. CORRECTIONS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FLOYD CO. COMM. CORRECTIONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TERRANCE CODY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARQUITA FORREST
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?