BARRETT v. BRANHAM et al
| CHRISTIAN SCOTT BARRETT |
| STATE OF INDIANA, MIKE BRANHAM and MIKE HAAG |
| 4:2020cv00252 |
| December 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 FINAL JUDGMENT - The Court having this day issued its Entry directing the entry of final judgment, now enters FINAL JUDGMENT and this action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/8/2021 (Copy mailed per distribution list).(TMC) |
Filing 7
Order Dismissing Action and Directing Entry of Final Judgment - In the Order of December 31, 2020, the Court dismissed the plaintiff's complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A and directed him to show cause why this case should not be dismissed. Dkt. 6. The plaintiff has not responded to this Order and the deadline to do so has passed. Accordingly, this action is now dismissed consistent with the Order of December 31, 2021. Because the complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a claim, the plaintiff is assessed a strike and notified that upon the receipt of three total strikes, he will not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in future litigation unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Judgment dismissing this action shall now issue. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/8/2021 (Copy mailed per distribution list).(TMC)
|
|
Filing 6
Order Denying Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, Screening Complaint, and Directing Further Proceedings - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is denied as presented. He shall have until January 25, 2021, in which to renew his motion to proceed in forma pauperis by attaching a copy of the transactions associated with his institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action on December 16, 2020. In addition, the complaint is dismissed for the reasons set forth above. The plaintiff shall have through January 25, 2021, to show cause why Judgment consistent with this Entry should not issue (See Order). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 12/31/2020 (Copy mailed per distribution list). (TMC)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by CHRISTIAN SCOTT BARRETT. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(TMC) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff, CHRISTIAN SCOTT BARRETT. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MIKE BRANHAM, MIKE HAAG, and STATE OF INDIANA, filed by CHRISTIAN SCOTT BARRETT. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
