BARRETT v. BRANHAM et al
CHRISTIAN SCOTT BARRETT |
STATE OF INDIANA, MIKE BRANHAM and MIKE HAAG |
4:2020cv00252 |
December 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 FINAL JUDGMENT - The Court having this day issued its Entry directing the entry of final judgment, now enters FINAL JUDGMENT and this action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/8/2021 (Copy mailed per distribution list).(TMC) |
|
|
Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC) |
Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by CHRISTIAN SCOTT BARRETT. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(TMC) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff, CHRISTIAN SCOTT BARRETT. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MIKE BRANHAM, MIKE HAAG, and STATE OF INDIANA, filed by CHRISTIAN SCOTT BARRETT. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.