JOHNSON v. SAUL
| HEIDI R. JOHNSON |
| ANDREW M. SAUL |
| 4:2021cv00007 |
| January 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant is granted an extension in this case until May 14, 2021, for the agency to produce and file with the court the certified administrative record necessary to answer and adjudicate this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 3/12/2021. (TMC)
|
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to May 14, 2021 to file transcript of certified administrative record, filed by Defendant ANDREW M. SAUL. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Jebby Rasputnis, #2 Text of Proposed Order granting extension)(Seagle, Catherine) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Catherine Seagle on behalf of Defendant ANDREW M. SAUL. (Seagle, Catherine) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch - The parties have indicated their consent to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge by the filing of a joint consent [Dkt. #6 ]. It is, therefore, ORDERED, that this case be referred to the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge, The Honorable Debra McVicker Lynch, to conduct all proceedings and order the entry of judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73. Please use altered case no. 4:21-cv-00007-DML-SEB on all future filings with this court (See Order). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 2/8/2021.(TMC)
|
| Filing 6 JOINT CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by ANDREW M. SAUL. (Wierenga, Julian) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Julian Clifford Wierenga on behalf of Defendant ANDREW M. SAUL. (Wierenga, Julian) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Julian Clifford Wierenga on behalf of Defendant ANDREW M. SAUL. (Wierenga, Julian) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (TMC) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy J. Vrana on behalf of Plaintiff HEIDI R. JOHNSON. (Vrana, Timothy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT to Review Decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration against ANDREW M. SAUL, filed by HEIDI R. JOHNSON. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 0756-6362292) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Vrana, Timothy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: JOHNSON v. SAUL | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: HEIDI R. JOHNSON | |
| Represented By: | Timothy J. Vrana |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL | |
| Represented By: | Julian Clifford Wierenga |
| Represented By: | Catherine Seagle |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
