WILLIAMS v. BOLEY et al
| Ashtyn Williams |
| Unidentified Officers from the Indiana State Police, Clay Boley and AS-YET UNIDENTIFIED OFFICERS FROM THE INDIANA STATE POLICE |
| 4:2021cv00068 |
| April 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
Order Setting Initial Pretrial Conference - This case is assigned for an initial pretrial conference by telephone on July 7, 2021, at 2:00 p.m. (Eastern Time), before United States Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch. The court will contact counsel by separate email through the court's electronic filing system with the call-in information to be used to participate in the conference. No fewer than seven days before the IPTC, counsel must file a proposed CMP (See Order). Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 6/4/2021.(TMC)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re, filed by Defendant CLAY BOLEY. (Blinn, Michael)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Appearance by Michael J. Blinn on behalf of Defendant CLAY BOLEY. (Blinn, Michael)
|
|
Filing 11
RETURN of Personal Service, filed by ASHTYN WILLIAMS. CLAY BOLEY served on 5/12/2021. (Art, Steven)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #8 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. David B. Owens is granted leave to appear pro hac vice on behalf of plaintiff in this matter. The court FURTHER ORDERS that David B. Owens register as users of the court's electronic case filing system by May 27, 2021. Failure to register could result in the revocation of his admission pro hac vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 5/13/2021 (Copy mailed per distribution list). (TMC)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Mark Loevy-Reyes is granted leave to appear pro hac vice on behalf of plaintiff in this matter. The court FURTHER ORDERS that Mark Loevy-Reyes register as users of the court's electronic case filing system by May 26, 2021. Failure to register could result in the revocation of his admission pro hac vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 5/12/2021 (Copy mailed per distribution list). (TMC)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Attorney(s) David B. Owens to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0756-6557643), filed by Plaintiff ASHTYN WILLIAMS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Certification of David B. Owens, #2 Proposed Order)(Art, Steven)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Attorney(s) Mark Loevy-Reyes to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0756-6555161), filed by Plaintiff ASHTYN WILLIAMS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Certification of Mark Loevy-Reyes, #2 Proposed Order)(Art, Steven)
|
|
Filing 6
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (TMC)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued by Clerk as to CLAY BOLEY. (TMC)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Arthur Loevy on behalf of Plaintiff Ashtyn Williams. (Loevy, Arthur)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan I. Loevy on behalf of Plaintiff Ashtyn Williams. (Loevy, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Steven E. Art on behalf of Plaintiff Ashtyn Williams. (Art, Steven)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Clay Boley, Unidentified Officers from the Indiana State Police, filed by Ashtyn Williams. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 0756-6535806) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Art, Steven)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
