CLARY v. BROWN et al
| JASON A. CLARY |
| LEXI BROWN, MEGAN ISALM and LARONZO BROWN |
| 4:2021cv00075 |
| May 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. While in forma pauperis status allows the plaintiff to proceed without pre-payment of the $350.00 filing fee, the plaintiff remains liable for the full fees. No payment is due at this time. Plaintiff's complaint, Dkt. #1 , is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff must file an amended complaint WITHIN FORTY DAYS of the date of this order or he will lose his lawsuit for good (See Order). Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 5/18/2021 (Copy mailed per distribution list). (TMC)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff JASON A. CLARY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LEXI BROWN, LARONZO BROWN, MEGAN ISALM, filed by JASON A. CLARY. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REO) Modified on 5/12/2021 to edit party name (TMC). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
