MILLS v. WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
JACOB MILLS |
BRENT MILLER, INDIANA STATE POLICE, WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, BRETT ALEXANDER WALTERS and CHRISTOPHER KEETON |
4:2021cv00088 |
May 26, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Sarah Evans Barker |
Debra McVicker Lynch |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Order Setting Initial Pretrial Conference - This case is assigned for an initial pretrial conference by telephone on August 19, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Time), before United States Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch. The court will contact counsel by separate email through the court's electronic filing system with the call-in information to be used to participate in the conference. No fewer than seven days before the IPTC, counsel must file a proposed CMP (See Order). Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 7/20/2021.(TMC) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Plaintiff's Complaint, filed by Defendants BRENT MILLER, WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE. (Howard, Dustin) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Molly Michelle McCann on behalf of Defendants INDIANA STATE POLICE, CHRISTOPHER KEETON, BRETT ALEXANDER WALTERS. (McCann, Molly) |
Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by BRETT ALEXANDER WALTERS, INDIANA STATE POLICE, CHRISTOPHER KEETON. BRETT ALEXANDER WALTERS waiver sent on 5/27/2021; INDIANA STATE POLICE waiver sent on 5/27/2021; CHRISTOPHER KEETON waiver sent on 5/27/2021. (Carlisle, Alexander) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexander Robert Carlisle on behalf of Defendants INDIANA STATE POLICE, CHRISTOPHER KEETON, BRETT ALEXANDER WALTERS. (Carlisle, Alexander) |
Filing 8 Notice of Parties First Extension of Time to Answer Complaint, filed by Defendants BRENT MILLER, WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE (Howard, Dustin) Modified on 6/23/2021 to edit document title (TMC). |
Filing 7 ORDER ON MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME - #5 Motion for Extension of Time is denied, without prejudice, because it does not comply with the requirements of Local Rule 6-1. The defendants are given leave to refile a notice or motion (whichever is required) that complies with all the provisions of that rule. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 6/21/2021. (LBT) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Dustin L. Howard on behalf of Defendants BRENT MILLER, WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE. (Howard, Dustin) Modified on 6/17/2021 to edit docket text and add party name (TMC). Modified on 6/18/2021 to terminate gavel (TMC). |
Filing 5 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT , filed by Defendant BRENT MILLER, WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE. (Attachments: #1 Order Granting Extension of Time to Answer Complaint)(Howard, Dustin) Modified on 6/17/2021 to add party name and correct event selection (TMC). |
Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (TMC) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued by Clerk as to BRENT MILLER, INDIANA STATE POLICE, CHRISTOPHER KEETON, BRETT ALEXANDER WALTERS, WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE. (TMC) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrea Lynn Ciobanu on behalf of Plaintiff JACOB MILLS. (Ciobanu, Andrea) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by JACOB MILLS. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 0756-6581833) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Ciobanu, Andrea) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.