SCOTT COUNTY REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT v. CITY OF SCOTTSBURG, INDIANA et al
| SCOTT COUNTY REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT |
| CITY OF SCOTTSBURG, INDIANA and CITY OF AUSTIN, INDIANA |
| 4:2021cv00148 |
| September 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Agriculture Acts |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER GRANTING SECOND AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR SCOTT COUNTY REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT TO RESPOND TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS #13 - Plaintiff shall have an additional sixty-day extension of time to January 21, 2022 to respond to the Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 11/4/2021. (TMC)
|
|
Filing 13
Second MOTION for Extension of Time to 01/21/2022 to respond re #9 MOTION TO DISMISS, filed by Plaintiff SCOTT COUNTY REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Dick, Bradley) Modified on 11/4/2021 (TMC). Modified on 11/4/2021 to edit document title, correct event selection and create entry relationship (TMC).
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to 11/22/2021 for Plaintiff to file a response re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/7/2021. (LBT)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to 11/22/2021 re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , filed by Plaintiff SCOTT COUNTY REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Dick, Bradley)
|
|
Filing 10
BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , filed by Defendants CITY OF AUSTIN, INDIANA, CITY OF SCOTTSBURG, INDIANA. (Crandley, Mark)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , filed by Defendants CITY OF AUSTIN, INDIANA, CITY OF SCOTTSBURG, INDIANA. (Crandley, Mark)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Mark Jason Crandley on behalf of Defendants CITY OF AUSTIN, INDIANA, CITY OF SCOTTSBURG, INDIANA. (Crandley, Mark)
|
|
Filing 7
RETURN of Service by CMRRR, filed by SCOTT COUNTY REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT. CITY OF AUSTIN, INDIANA served on 9/13/2021; CITY OF SCOTTSBURG, INDIANA served on 9/13/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Return Receipts)(Dick, Bradley) Modified on 9/28/2021 to edit document title (TMC).
|
|
Filing 6
PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (TMC)
|
|
Filing 5
MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (TMC)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued by Clerk as to CITY OF AUSTIN, INDIANA, CITY OF SCOTTSBURG, INDIANA. (TMC)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by J. Christopher Janak on behalf of Plaintiff SCOTT COUNTY REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT. (Janak, J.)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Bradley M. Dick on behalf of Plaintiff SCOTT COUNTY REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT. (Dick, Bradley)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment, Injunctive Relief, Breach of Contract, and Attorneys' Fees against CITY OF AUSTIN, INDIANA, CITY OF SCOTTSBURG, INDIANA, filed by SCOTT COUNTY REGIONAL SEWER DISTRICT. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 0756-6737065) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Scottsburg Agreement, #2 Exhibit 2 - Scottsburg Amendment, #3 Exhibit 3 - Austin Agreement, #4 Exhibit 4 - April 2021 Correspondence, #5 Exhibit 5 - Joint Petition, #6 Exhibit 6- August 2021 Correspondence, #7 Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Proposed Summons, #9 Proposed Summons)(Dick, Bradley)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
