HUMPHREY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
| TRAVIS HUMPHREY |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 4:2022cv00012 |
| January 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 FINAL JUDGMENT - The Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT. The action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/2/2022.(AAS) |
Filing 6
ORDER DISMISSING 2255 MOTION AND DIRECTING ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT - Humphrey's motion plainly shows that he is not entitled to relief under 2255. He is not in custody under the sentence of a federal court--or of any court, for that matter. This action is dismissed pursuant to Rule 4 for lack of jurisdiction. The clerk is directed to enter final judgment. The clerk is also directed to include a form civil rights complaint with Mr. Humphrey's copy of this Order. If Mr. Humphrey believes he is being held under unconstitutional conditions, he may assert those claims in a civil action. Humphrey's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is denied as moot because no fee is necessary. SEE ORDER. Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/2/2022. (Attachments: #1 Complaint Form) (AAS)
|
| Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of District of Columbia; Case Number 1:21-cv-03176. Original file copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING PRO SE CASE to the USDC for the Southern District of Indiana. Pro Se party has been notified by first class mail. Transfer due by 1/24/2022. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 1/4/2022. (ztnr) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 1/31/2022.]
|
| Filing 3 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT for period of six months by TRAVIS HUMPHREY (zsb) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 1/31/2022.] |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by TRAVIS HUMPHREY. (zsb) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 1/31/2022.] |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) filed by TRAVIS HUMPHREY. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit) (zsb) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 1/31/2022.] |
| Initiating Pleading & IFP Application Received on 12/02/2021. A copy of the docket sheet has been mailed to the address of record for the pro se party. (zsb) [Transferred from District of Columbia on 1/31/2022.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HUMPHREY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: TRAVIS HUMPHREY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
