KELLY v. DORMAN et al
| MARK KELLY |
| DANIEL DORMAN, DAVID WRIGHT, CHRISTOPHER HANSON and JEFF BARAN |
| 4:2022cv00071 |
| May 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to File ; denying as moot #13 Motion: Plaintiff Mark Kelly, who is proceeding pro se, has filed a motion for extension of time to file an amended complaint (Dkt. 12). Being duly advised, the court GRANTS the motion for extension of time. Mr. Kelly's deadline to file an amended complaint is extended to September 13, 2022. Mr. Kelly's motion to accept an amended complaint (Dkt. 13) is DENIED AS MOOT. Mr. Kelly may file his amended complaint on or before September 13, 2022. See Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 7/19/2022. Copy mailed to plaintiff. (LF)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION to Accept the Following First Amended Complaint into the Record, filed by Plaintiff MARK KELLY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F Pt. 1, #7 Exhibit Exhibit F Pt. 3, #8 Exhibit Exhibit F Pt. 2, #9 Exhibit Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit Exhibit H, #11 Exhibit Exhibit I, #12 Exhibit Exhibit J, #13 Exhibit Exhibit K Pt. 1, #14 Exhibit Exhibit K Pt. 3, #15 Exhibit Exhibit K Pt. 2, #16 Exhibit Exhibit K, #17 Exhibit Exhibit L, #18 Exhibit Exhibit M, #19 Exhibit Exhibit N, #20 Exhibit Exhibit O)(LF) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time for 60 Day Extension to File Amended Complaint, filed by Plaintiff MARK KELLY. (LF) |
|
Filing 11
ENTRY SCREENING COMPLAINT AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Having screened the Complaint, the Court finds it is subject to dismissal for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint by no later than Friday, July 15, 2022. If no amended complaint is filed by that date, this action will be dismissed for the reasons set forth above. See Order. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/15/2022. Copy mailed to plaintiff via US Mail. (LF)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion- Request GRANTED. Dkt. 9-1 and Dkt. 9-2 will serve as redacted versions of the exhibits attached to the Complaint. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (LF)
|
| Filing 9 Motion To Re-File Exhibit B and Exhibit J Redacted To Remove Personal Information, filed by Plaintiff MARK KELLY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B, #2 Exhibit J)(LF) |
|
Filing 8
NOTICE to Pro se Plaintiff - It has come to the Court's attention that exhibits B and J attached to pro se Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. 1) contain personal data identifiers. The Clerk of Court is directed to temporarily restrict the exhibits to case participants only. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/25/2022 Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (LF) Modified to clarify text on 5/25/2022 (LF).
|
| Filing 7 RECEIPT #124 for filing fee in the amount of $402.00, paid by MARK KELLY. (DJH) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through 6/22/2022 in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the 402.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). A form motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee is being provided for your use. NOTE TO PRISONER - If you seek leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, and you are a prisoner, your motion must be accompanied by a copy of the transactions associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. (TRG) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (TRG) |
| Filing 6 EXHIBIT K re #1 Complaint by MARK KELLY. (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3)(LF) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LF) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to submit this complaint, filed by Plaintiff MARK KELLY. (LF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JEFF BARAN, DANIEL DORMAN, CHRISTOPHER HANSON, DAVID WRIGHT, filed by MARK KELLY. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit H, #8 Exhibit I, #9 Exhibit J, #10 Exhibit L, #11 Exhibit M, #12 Exhibit N, #13 Exhibit O, #14 Exhibit P, #15 Exhibit Q)(LF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
