BARMORE v. CFS BRANDS, LLC et al
| JOAN M. BARMORE |
| CFS BRANDS, LLC, AMAZON SERVICES LLC, AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC and AMAZON.COM SALES, INC. |
| 4:2022cv00074 |
| May 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 CLOSED DISMISSED/Acknowledged. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/19/2022. (LF) |
| Filing 20 STIPULATION of Dismissal , as to Defendant CFS BRANDS, LLC, filed by JOAN M. BARMORE. (Russell, Ryan) |
Filing 19
Order Setting Initial Pretrial Conference: This case is assigned for an initial pretrial conference by telephone on August 19, 2022, at 1:30 p.m. (Eastern Time), before United States Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch. The court will contact counsel by separate email through the court's electronic filing system with the call-in information to be used to participate in the conference. No fewer than seven days before the IPTC, counsel must file a proposed CMP. See Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 7/13/2022. (LF)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER Acknowledged #17 Stipulation of Dismissal. See Order. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/08/2022. (LF)
|
| Filing 17 STIPULATION of Dismissal of Amazon Defendants, as to Defendants AMAZON SERVICES LLC, AMAZON.COM SALES, INC., AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC, filed by JOAN M. BARMORE. (Russell, Ryan) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #15 Motion for Extension of Time to File: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for Defendant CFS Brands, LLC to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby extended up to and including July 30, 2022. See Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 7/1/2022. (LF)
|
| Filing 15 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to 7/30/22 to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, filed by Defendant CFS BRANDS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Agreed Order)(Smith, Maxwell) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendants AMAZON SERVICES LLC, AMAZON.COM SALES, INC., AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC. (Moutardier, Curtis) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER denying #12 Motion for Extension of Time: On June 24, 2022, defendants, Amazon Services, LLC, Amazon.com Services, LLC, and Amazon.com Sales, Inc., filed an agreed motion for extension of time to answer or respond to plaintiff's complaint (Dkt. 12). That motion is denied, without prejudice, because it does not comply with the requirements of Local Rule 6-1. Defendants, Amazon Services, LLC, Amazon.com Services, LLC, and Amazon.com Sales, Inc., are given leave to refile a notice or motion (whichever is required) that complies with all the provisions of that rule. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 6/27/2022. (LF)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to July 25, 2022 , filed by Defendants AMAZON SERVICES LLC, AMAZON.COM SALES, INC., AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Moutardier, Curtis) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Curtis Paul Moutardier on behalf of Defendants AMAZON SERVICES LLC, AMAZON.COM SALES, INC., AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC. (Moutardier, Curtis) |
| Filing 10 Jurisdictional Statement by JOAN M. BARMORE. (Russell, Ryan) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER/SECOND ENTRY ON JURISDICTION- On May 31, 2022, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a Supplemental Jurisdictional Statement to establish the Court's jurisdiction over this case. Plaintiff was ordered to specifically identify the citizenship of the Defendants (Filing No. 5). On June 2, 2022, Plaintiff filed her Supplemental Jurisdictional Statement (Filing No. 6); however, Plaintiff's Statement fails to sufficiently allege the citizenship of the LLC Defendants. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file another supplemental jurisdictional statement that establishes the Court's jurisdiction over this case. The jurisdictional statement should sufficiently allege the citizenship of the LLC Defendants. This Supplemental Jurisdictional Statement is due no later than Friday, July 1, 2022. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 6/9/2022.(LF)
|
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to AMAZON.COM SALES, INC.. (LF) |
| Filing 7 Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to JOAN M. BARMORE. (Russell, Ryan) |
| Filing 6 Jurisdictional Statement by JOAN M. BARMORE. (Russell, Ryan) |
|
Filing 5
ENTRY ON JURISDICTION- The Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a Supplemental Jurisdictional Statement that establishes the Court's jurisdiction over this case. This statement should specifically identify the citizenship of the Defendants. This jurisdictional statement is due fourteen (14) days from the date of this Entry. See Order. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/31/2022.(LF)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Ryan Thomas Russell on behalf of Plaintiff JOAN M. BARMORE. (Russell, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LF) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to AMAZON SERVICES LLC, AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC, CFS BRANDS, LLC. (LF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by JOAN M. BARMORE. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7122700) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons CFS Brands, #3 Proposed Summons Amazon Services, #4 Proposed Summons Amazon.com Services, #5 Proposed Summons Amazon.com Sales)(Russell, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
