BLEWETT v. KIJAKAZI
| MARK A. BLEWETT |
| KILOLO KIJAKAZI |
| 4:2022cv00097 |
| July 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge: The parties have indicated their consent to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge by the filing of a joint consent [Dkt. 8]. It is, therefore, ORDERED, that this case be referred to the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge, The Honorable Debra McVicker Lynch, to conduct all proceedings and order the entry of judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73. Should this case be reassigned to a magistrate judge other than the magistrate judge assigned the date of this order, any attorney or party of record may object within 30 days of such reassignment. If no objection is filed, the consent will remain in effect. The cause number of this action shall be amended to reflect the referral of this action to the Magistrate Judge. Please use altered case no. 4:22-cv-00097-DML-SEB on all future filings with this court. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 8/25/2022. (LF)
|
| Filing 8 JOINT CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by KILOLO KIJAKAZI. (Wierenga, Julian) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Julian Clifford Wierenga on behalf of Defendant KILOLO KIJAKAZI. (Wierenga, Julian) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. See Order. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 8/1/2022. Copy mailed pursuant to distribution list. (LF)
|
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LF) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas Thomas Lavella on behalf of Plaintiff MARK A. BLEWETT. (Lavella, Nicholas) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Frederick Richter on behalf of Plaintiff MARK A. BLEWETT. (Richter, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Plaintiff MARK A. BLEWETT. (Richter, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KILOLO KIJAKAZI, filed by MARK A. BLEWETT. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Richter, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BLEWETT v. KIJAKAZI | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MARK A. BLEWETT | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas Thomas Lavella |
| Represented By: | Matthew Frederick Richter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI | |
| Represented By: | Julian Clifford Wierenga |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
