VANWEY v. SARKISIAN
Plaintiff: DARREN CHRISTOPHER VANWEY
Defendant: SAMMY D. SARKISIAN
Case Number: 4:2022cv00114
Filed: September 7, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Kellie M Barr
Referring Judge: Debra McVicker Lynch
2 Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 4, 2022 Filing 8 CLOSED JUDGMENT - The Court having this day made its Entry directing the entry of final judgment, the Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT. This action is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 11/4/2022 (Copy mailed to Plaintiff).(LBT)
November 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ENTRY DISMISSING ACTION AND DIRECTING ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT - For the reasons discussed in the prior screening Order (Filing No. #4 ), this action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). Final judgment consistent with this Entry will be issued under separate order. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 11/4/2022 (Copy mailed to Plaintiff).(LBT)
November 1, 2022 Filing 6 Reassignment of Case to Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr. Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number (4:22-cv-00114-TWP-KMB), which includes the initials of the newly assigned judge, on all future filings in this matter. (CJD)
September 13, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (TRG)
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, SCREENING AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiff's Request to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying the Full Filing Fee (Filing No. 2) is GRANTED. Having screened the Complaint, the Court finds it is subject to dismissal for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint by no later than Friday, October 14, 2022. If no amended complaint is filed by that date, this action will be dismissed for the reasons set forth above. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/13/2022. Copy mailed per Distribution list. (LF)
September 7, 2022 Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LF)
August 30, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff DARREN CHRISTOPHER VANWEY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LF)
August 30, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SAMMY D. SARKISIAN, filed by DARREN CHRISTOPHER VANWEY. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Envelope)(LF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: VANWEY v. SARKISIAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DARREN CHRISTOPHER VANWEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SAMMY D. SARKISIAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?