SMITH v. NEWMAN
Plaintiff: DEBORAH SMITH
Defendant: ROBERT B. NEWMAN and LISA T. MEEKS
Case Number: 4:2022cv00117
Filed: September 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Kellie M Barr
Referring Judge: Debra McVicker Lynch
2 Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2022 Filing 8 Reassignment of Case to Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr. Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number (4:22-cv-00117-TWP-KMB), which includes the initials of the newly assigned judge, on all future filings in this matter. (CJD)
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ENTRY SCREENING COMPLAINT AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Having screened the Complaint, the Court finds it is subject to dismissal for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint by no later than Friday, October 28, 2022. If no amended complaint is filed by that date, this action will be dismissed for the reasons set forth above. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/03/2022. Copy mailed per distribution list.(LF)
September 23, 2022 Filing 6 REQUEST for Production of Documents for Robert Newman, filed by Plaintiff DEBORAH SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in support for request., #2 Envelope)(LF)
September 23, 2022 Filing 5 REQUEST for Production of Documents for Lisa Meeks, filed by Plaintiff DEBORAH SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in support for request., #2 Envelope)(LF)
September 16, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , filed by Defendants LISA T. MEEKS, ROBERT B. NEWMAN. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Affidavit)(Newman, Robert)
September 13, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (TRG)
September 12, 2022 Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LF)
September 8, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ROBERT B. NEWMAN, LISA T. MEEKS, filed by DEBORAH SMITH. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 1690) (LF) Modified to correct docket text on 9/12/2022 (LF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SMITH v. NEWMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DEBORAH SMITH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROBERT B. NEWMAN
Represented By: Robert B. Newman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LISA T. MEEKS
Represented By: Robert B. Newman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?