MORGAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
4:2022cv00155 |
December 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Kellie M Barr |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Petition for Stare Decisis, filed by Plaintiff DAVID BRIAN MORGAN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LBT) Modified to correct event on 2/2/2023 (JRT). |
Filing 11 ORDER on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis - #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. The plaintiff's trust account information reflects that he has sufficient funds to pay the full filing of Four Hundred and Two Dollars ($402.00). He shall have through February 21, 2023, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/20/2023 (Copy mailed to Plaintiff). (LBT) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE to notice of deficiency Dkt #6 submission of trust accounts, filed by Plaintiff DAVID BRIAN MORGAN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LF) |
Filing 9 Submission of pro se appearance, filed by Plaintiff DAVID BRIAN MORGAN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LF) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Plaintiff DAVID BRIAN MORGAN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LF) |
Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by DAVID BRIAN MORGAN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LBT) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through January 23, 2023, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: Your motion to proceed in forma pauperis cannot be ruled on because you have not submitted a copy of the transaction history associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail). (JRT) |
Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail). (JRT) |
Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (LBT) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LBT) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff DAVID BRIAN MORGAN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LBT) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, filed by DAVID BRIAN MORGAN. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LBT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: MORGAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: DAVID BRIAN MORGAN | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.